Mandate

Vinge advises in the divestment of Nordic Water

January 12, 2021

Vinge advises Alder and the other shareholders in connection with the divestment of Nordic Water Holding AB and its subsidiaries to Sulzer AG. Since 1961, the Nordic Water Group is active within development, distribution and service of solutions and products for wastewater treatment.

The Group has its headquarters in Gothenburg and has approximately 200 employees in six countries. Sulzer AG is a Swiss industrial engineering and manufacturing company. The transaction is subject to customary conditions and approvals and is expected to close in Q1 2021.

Vinge’s team consisted of, among others, Johan Larsson, Carl Sander, Hannah Kajlinger and Olivia Belding (M&A), Viktoria Owetz Leyva (VDR Specialist), Albert Wållgren and Ludvig Wettergren (Financial Arrangements), as well as Ebba Svenburg and Gustav Lindgren (Employment).

 

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021