Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge advises Main Capital and Onventis in connection with their acquisition of Spendency AB
Mandate

Vinge advises Main Capital and Onventis in connection with their acquisition of Spendency AB

November 29, 2021

Established in 2015, with headquarters in Stockholm, Spendency has grown into a leading spend analytics provider.

Connected directly to the clients’ ERP and/or procurement system, Spendency helps its customers to collect, enrich and normalise supplier data. Spendency serves a vast customer base of more than 100 customers and over 1,500 users. Through the acquisition, Onventis strategically expands its product offering within spend analytics.

Vinge’s team consisted of Filip Öhrner and Eléonore Friberg (M&A), Ebba Svenburg (Employment), Karl-Hugo Engdahl (Agreements), Karolina Fuhrman (GDPR/IT), Arvid Axelryd (IP) and Jessica Henning (VDR).

 

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

 The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

 The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

 On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021