Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge acts as legal advisers in connection with Duni AB’s admission to the OMX Nordic Stock Exchange in Stockholm
Mandate

Vinge acts as legal advisers in connection with Duni AB’s admission to the OMX Nordic Stock Exchange in Stockholm

November 14, 2007

Vinge is acting as legal advisers in connection with Duni AB’s admission to the stock exchange. Duni AB is indirectly owned by EQT through Duni Holding AB.
The offer comprises 28,200,000 shares, representing 60.0 per cent of the shares and the votes in the company, and will be carried out through the sale of shares by Duni Holding AB. The total value of the offer amounts to MSEK 1,410 which corresponds to a value of outstanding shares in the company of MSEK 2,350.

The partner in charge is Rikard Stenberg assisted by associates Henrik Fritz, Petter Alberts, Ulrich Ziche, Marion Ehmann, Helena Backlund and others.

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021