News The Patent and Market Court of Appeal holds that Crisp Rolls is not deemed to constitute an infringement of the trademark KRISPROLLS

January 21, 2019

Since the 1990s, Pågen has held the trademark KRISPROLLS registered for crisp rolls. When Danish Bisca launched crisp rolls on the Swedish market under the trademark CRISP ROLLS Pågen reacted and wanted to stop the mark. 

Efforts were also made to try and prevent a subsequent variation of Bisca where Crisp Rolls was used in a more descriptive manner in a smaller typeface. 

The Patent and Market Court of Appeal has concluded that the trademark KRISPROLLS has relatively weak original distinctiveness for crisp rolls and that the holder of the registration had failed to show that the trademarks through use had achieved acquired distinctiveness in relation to goods of this type. In addition, the Patent and Market Court of Appeal found that the questioned use of Crisp Rolls could not be construed as trademark use as well as that there is no identity between the mark CRISP ROLLS and the trademark KRISPROLLS or that there is any risk of confusion between these marks. 

The Patent and Market Court of Appeal has thus agreed with the Patent and Market Court’s assessment that the use of CRISP ROLLS and Crisp Rolls which were assessed in these proceedings does not constitute an infringement of the exclusive right to the trademark KRISPROLLS. 

The Patent and Market Court of Appeal’s judgment cannot be appealed.

Clarification of the interpretation of ”nearest suitable railway station”

Road transport performed by Samskip Sia in Sweden has been confirmed to be within the framework of a permitted combined transport through a decision of the Administrative court of Falun in Sweden. The central question in the case was how to interpret the term “nearest suitable railway station”
June 30, 2020

DAC 6 – EU Directive concerning reportable cross‑border tax arrangements

DAC 6 is a EU Directive which entails that advisers are subject to a duty to notify the relevant tax authorities concerning their client’s cross‑border arrangements. The purpose of the information disclosure obligation is to combat tax evasion, tax fraud and tax avoidance.
June 04, 2020

The importance of continuous focus on compliance procedures in disrupting times

A large number of corporations will most certainly be severely impacted by the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. The new challenges will impact companies’ compliance risks, which are likely to be different and, to a certain extent, increased. It is crucial that - also in disrupting times - internal compliance procedures are maintained and that new risks are identified and mitigated.
May 28, 2020