News New Swedish Rules regarding State Aid

May 31, 2013

A new Act concerning the application of the EU State aid rules in Sweden enters into force on 1 July.

The new Swedish Act governs the obligations of both providers and beneficiaries of State aid. The legislation primarily codifies the case law of the EU Court of Justice, but there are also new provisions that regulate, among other things, how unlawful aid shall be recovered in Sweden.

In parallel, the European Commission has presented a proposal concerning the modernisation of the rules governing its handling of State aid matters. It is foreseen that the new procedural rules will enter into force sometime during the second half of this year.

In addition to the mainly practical requirements which are primarily imposed on providers of State aid, the new regulatory framework has the effect of putting the spotlight on the State aid rules and their application. It is therefore advisable for companies to review their potential exposure to unlawful State aid. This applies not least in conjunction with M&A transactions.

The new rules
The practical effects of the new rules are, among other things, that:

  • Providers of aid must inform the Government about the introduction of and changes to aid measures. They will also be under a legal obligation to commence judicial proceedings in order to ensure recovery of unlawful aid.
  • It will be more difficult in practice for beneficiaries of aid to avoid the recovery of unlawful aid since it is made clear that the duty to reimburse cannot be deviated from. It is for example irrelevant whether a binding civil law agreement has been concluded or whether the aid has been received in good faith.
  • Third parties are also directly affected by the rules since both the Swedish Government and the European Commission will be entitled to demand information directly from companies, irrespective of whether they are suspected of being beneficiaries of unlawful aid or competitors of such beneficiaries.

Many are affected
The rules affect a significant number of undertakings, for example State and municipal companies/private equity funds which give or receive aid, companies which receive or have received unlawful aid as well as companies which are considering acquiring or selling such companies. The rules are of course also of interest for those who take the view that one of their competitors has received unlawful aid.

What can Vinge help with?
Vinge’s EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group assists clients in respect of all aspects of the application of the State aid rules. We assist and advice in in connection with notifications of State aid to the European Commission as well as in connection with the Commission’s investigations of suspected unlawful aid. The group also assists and advice clients regarding the lodging of complaints to the European Commission concerning suspected unlawful aid granted to competitors. The group further assists clients with State aid assessments in conjunction with M&A transactions.

If you have any questions concerning the new Swedish Act or regarding the State aid rules generally, please contact:

Johan Karlsson
Partner and responsible for Vinge’s EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group, Stockholm
johan.karlsson@vinge.se

Martin Johansson,
Partner EU, Competition & Regulatory, Brussels
martin.johansson@vinge.se

Pär Remnelid,
Partner EU, Competition & Regulatory, Malmö
per.remnelid@vinge.se

Björn Nicolai,
Partner EU, Competition & Regulatory, Gothenburg
bjorn.nicolai@vinge.se

Clarification of the interpretation of ”nearest suitable railway station”

Road transport performed by Samskip Sia in Sweden has been confirmed to be within the framework of a permitted combined transport through a decision of the Administrative court of Falun in Sweden. The central question in the case was how to interpret the term “nearest suitable railway station”
June 30, 2020

DAC 6 – EU Directive concerning reportable cross‑border tax arrangements

DAC 6 is a EU Directive which entails that advisers are subject to a duty to notify the relevant tax authorities concerning their client’s cross‑border arrangements. The purpose of the information disclosure obligation is to combat tax evasion, tax fraud and tax avoidance.
June 04, 2020

The importance of continuous focus on compliance procedures in disrupting times

A large number of corporations will most certainly be severely impacted by the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. The new challenges will impact companies’ compliance risks, which are likely to be different and, to a certain extent, increased. It is crucial that - also in disrupting times - internal compliance procedures are maintained and that new risks are identified and mitigated.
May 28, 2020