Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge has advised SEB in connection with an issue of additional Tier 1 captial of MUSD 600
Mandate

Vinge has advised SEB in connection with an issue of additional Tier 1 captial of MUSD 600

March 27, 2017

Vinge has advised Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”) as to Swedish law in connection with the bank’s issue of Additional Tier 1 Capital in the amount of MUSD 600 in the form of a debt instrument with no final maturity and with automatically conversion into Class A-shares if the CET1 ratio of the bank decreases to a certain level.

The instrument is listed on the Global Exchange Market regulated by the Irish Stock Exchange.

SEB issued the Additional Tier 1 Capital to refinance an old similar instrument that reaches its call date later this year and to optimize its capital structure.

Vinge’s team consisted mainly of Göran Nyström, Charlotte Levin, Albert Wållgren and Malte Hedlund.

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021