Mandate

Vinge advises Swedish Match in relation to Scandinavian Tobacco Group’s listing on Nasdaq Copenhagen

February 19, 2016

Vinge advised Swedish Match AB in relation to Scandinavian Tobacco Group A/S’s listing on Nasdaq Copenhagen. Scandinavian Tobacco Group (STG) is a world leading manufacturer of cigars and pipe tobacco.

A prospectus was published on 28 January 2016 and the first day of trading on Nasdaq Copenhagen was on 10 February 2016. The price in the offering was set at DKK 100 per share, corresponding to a market capitalisation of DKK 10 billion for STG.

Swedish Match owned, through Swedish Match Cigars Holding AB, 49 percent of STG before the offering and owns 31.2 percent of STG after completion of the offering and prior to any exercise of the overallotment option.

Vinge’s team primarily consisted of Charlotte Levin, Jonas Johansson, Joakim Hagberg, Amanda Knutsson, Malte Hedlund and Maria Schultzberg.

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021