Mandate

Vinge advises owner in connection with sale of Kung Markatta

May 06, 2013

Vinge has advised Ekomodern F, W & E AB in connection with the sale of Kung Markatta AB to Priveq Investment Fund IV. The company’s current indirect owners, i.e. Peter Enberg, Stefan Wilhelmson and CEO Anders Dahlin, will retain significant shareholdings through a new holding company formed in conjunction with the acquisition.

Kung Markatta is a market leader in Sweden within the distribution and marketing of ecological and natural products. The company, which was established in Örebro in 1983, has expanded significantly since it was acquired in 2004 by Peter Enberg and his partners. In addition to its own well-renowned range of approximately 150 ecological products under the Kung Markatta trade mark, the company also markets a large portfolio of other brands such as, among others, Alpro, Rice Dream, Yogi Tea, and Green & Black’s.  The company’s turnover in 2012 was approximately SEK 200 million and it currently employs 30 people.

Vinge’s team consisted of partner Daniel Rosvall together with, among others, associates Kristian Ford, Markus Larsson and Maria Dahlin.     

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021