Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge advises Öhman, Procuritas, Spiltan and others in connection with the acquisition of 51.1 per cent of the shares in Emric AB
Mandate

Vinge advises Öhman, Procuritas, Spiltan and others in connection with the acquisition of 51.1 per cent of the shares in Emric AB

June 10, 2010

Vinge is advising KB Götaberg 20 (Öhman), Investmentbolaget av 1 maj 2009 AB (Procuritas), Investment AB (Spiltan), Norra Brofästet i Sundsvall AB and F. Månsson Invest AB in connection with the acquisition of 50.1 per cent of the shares in Emric AB from Bisnode AB. Emric is one of Sweden's leading providers of software, expert consultancy and outsourcing services to the banking and financial services sector. The acquisition is based on a call option which was issued in connection with Bisnode's purchase of 50.1 per cent of the shares in Emric in 2007.
 
Vinge's team advising the buyers consists of partner Henrik Wenckert and associates Marie Brommesson and Peter Sundgren.

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

 The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

 The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

 On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021