Mandate

Vinge advises Fidelio Capital in connection with its investment in Indiska

September 01, 2016

Vinge has advised Fidelio Capital in connection with its investment in INDISKA.

The investment has been made pursuant to a loan which can be subsequently converted into a stake in the company. INDISKA is a Swedish family-owned company which has existed for more than a century. INDISKA sells clothing, fittings and accessories with a modern and unique design in more than 100 stores located in Sweden, Norway, Finland and Germany as well as through INDISKA Shop Online.

Vinge’s team consisted of responsible partner Jonas Bergström together with, among others, Adriana Berglund and Malte Hedlund (M&A), Robert Wikholm and Klara Håstad (Reconstruction Issues), Anna Lönegarn (Real Estate), Tomas Forsgren (IPR) and Adam Sandberg (Financing).

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021