Mandate Vinge advises EQT in connection with sale of TitanX

August 16, 2016

Vinge advises EQT Opportunity and Fouriertransform AB and other sellers in connection with the sale of TitanX Engine Cooling (“TitanX”) to Tata AutoComp Systems Ltd (“Tata”), one of India’s leading auto-component conglomerates. TitanX is a global supplier of powertrain cooling solutions for commercial vehicles and the company serves most of the western world’s OEMs, including Volvo Trucks, Scania, Daimler and Iveco. TitanX has a yearly turnover of SEK 1.6 billion and manufacturers in Sweden, USA, Mexico, Brazil and China.

Subject to customary regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to be completed during the fall of 2016.

Vinge’s team has primarily consisted of Christina Kokko, Sofie Bjärtun and Samra Baytar (M&A), Fredrik Gustafsson and Karin Isacsson (employment), Thomas Sjöberg and Matilda Gustafsson (environmental), Louise Brorsson and Helena Håkansson (finance) and Pernilla Warg (projectassistant). 

Vinge contributes to IUMI Eye

International Union of Marine Insurers (IUMI) is preparing for its first web based conference – Stockholm 2020 – of which Vinge is a proud sponsor. In the latest edition of IUMI Eye, published just in time for the conference, Vinge’s Paula Bäckdén and Sweden Insurance’s senior advisor Mikaela Tamm discuss the implications of waiving liability limitations.
September 15, 2020

Vinge – Best law firm for female business lawyers

Vinge has been awarded “Best Nordic Business Law Firm for Women” at the European Women in Business Law Awards which took place in London on 10 September. For the eighth time, Vinge has won the award as the law firm which has been most successful in relation to its gender equality work.
September 10, 2020

Clarification of the interpretation of ”nearest suitable railway station”

Road transport performed by Samskip Sia in Sweden has been confirmed to be within the framework of a permitted combined transport through a decision of the Administrative court of Falun in Sweden. The central question in the case was how to interpret the term “nearest suitable railway station”
June 30, 2020