Mandate

Vinge advises Doro in connection with the acquisition of IVS

May 15, 2013

Vinge has advised Doro in connection with the acquisition of the German distributor IVS Industrievertretung Schweiger GmbH (“IVS”). The acquisition price for IVS, including the maximum additional purchase price in 2014 and 2015, amounts to EUR 17.6 million on a cash and debt free basis. The acquisition is financed through a combination of existing cash and bank loans and Doro also has an option to finance part of the acquisition with Doro shares.

Doro’s products and solutions are available in more than 30 countries spanning five continents and the product range includes mobile phones, apps and software, fixed telephony, telecare and solutions within mHealth. Doro’s turnover in 2012 was SEK 837.5 million and the company’s shares are listed on OMX Nasdaq Stockholm, Nordic List, Small-cap.

Vinge primarily advised Doro on the capital markets and corporate law issues pertaining to the acquisition. Vinge’s team consisted of responsible partner Johan Winnerblad together with associates Charlotte Levin, Matthias Pannier, Dain Nevonen and Christian Hybbinette. 

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021