News

Administrative Court Judgment – Shareholders of private equity funds are taxed according to capital income

December 10, 2018

On 20 November 2018, the Stockholm Administrative Court decided that dividends to eleven persons who indirectly owned units in the private equity firms Valedo Fund I AB and Valedo Fund II AB, shall only be taxed in the capital income tax category.

The reason is that the so called third party rule is applicable. 

Vinge acted for the companies in the civil proceedings where the court decided that neither Valedo I nor Valedo II has a structure which is typical for a private equity firm. The so called third party rule is thus applicable. The rule entails that passive and active shareholders are taxed according to the tax rate for capital income provided that the passive owners have a profit share of at least 30%. 

An international and traditional structure for private equity firms makes the shareholding qualified, which means that dividends are taxed in both the income category of services and the income category relating to capital. For the operations which are focused within the Nordic region, it is more beneficial to combine the operations in a company with a Swedish limited liability company structure. 

The Administrative Court considers that the dividend structure in Valedo I and Valedo II has not counteracted the purpose of the rules governing dividends in respect of qualified holdings. Accordingly, no special grounds exist and the third party rule shall thus apply.

Read more here

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021