Mandate

Vinge has advised Ikano in connection with the acquisition of Citibank’s Shell MasterCard portfolio

August 30, 2010

Vinge has advised Ikano Bank SE in connection with the acquisition of Citibank’s Shell MasterCard portfolio valued at approximately SEK 280 million and in connection with a co-operation agreement with AB Svenska Shell relating to the issuance and operation of Shell MasterCard to private customers in Sweden.

Vinge’s team primarily consisted of responsible partner Fredrik Wilkens and associates Emma Stuart-Beck and Ulrica Åkesson.

Earlier this year Ikano also took over Citibank’s Shell MasterCard portfolio in Norway valued at NOK 283 million. Vinge also advised Ikano Bank SE in relation to this transaction and on this occasion Vinge’s team primarily consisted of responsible partner Fredrik Wilkens and associates Emma Stuart-Beck, Christian Johansson and Ulrica Åkesson.

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021