We use cookies to give you a better Web experience. By visiting our website you agree to our use of cookies. Read about cookies
OK
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge has advised Ambea on a rights issue

Mandate Vinge has advised Ambea on a rights issue

June 19, 2019

Vinge has advised Ambea AB (publ) on a fully subscribed rights issue, which will provide Ambea with issue proceeds amounting to approximately SEK 1,215 million before costs.

The new shares are expected to be admitted to trading on Nasdaq Stockholm on 25 June 2019.

Ambea is the market leading private care provider in Sweden, Norway and Denmark respectively, with about 900 units and around 26,000 employees. Through the brands Nytida, Vardaga, Lära, Klara, Stendi and Altiden, Ambea provides housing, support, education and personnel for health and social care.

Ambea is listed on Nasdaq Stockholm, Mid cap.

Vinge’s team consisted primarily of Charlotte Levin, Nils Fredrik Dehlin, Annika Nyberg Ekenberg and Marcus Gustavsson.
 

Vinge contributes to IUMI Eye

 International Union of Marine Insurers (IUMI) is preparing for its first web based conference – Stockholm 2020 – of which Vinge is a proud sponsor. In the latest edition of IUMI Eye, published just in time for the conference, Vinge’s Paula Bäckdén and Sweden Insurance’s senior advisor Mikaela Tamm discuss the implications of waiving liability limitations.
September 15, 2020

Vinge – Best law firm for female business lawyers

 Vinge has been awarded “Best Nordic Business Law Firm for Women” at the European Women in Business Law Awards which took place in London on 10 September. For the eighth time, Vinge has won the award as the law firm which has been most successful in relation to its gender equality work.
September 10, 2020

Clarification of the interpretation of ”nearest suitable railway station”

 Road transport performed by Samskip Sia in Sweden has been confirmed to be within the framework of a permitted combined transport through a decision of the Administrative court of Falun in Sweden. The central question in the case was how to interpret the term “nearest suitable railway station”
June 30, 2020