Mandate

Vinge advises Tele2 in connection with the acquisition of TDC Sverige

June 21, 2016

Vinge has advised Tele2 Sverige AB in connection with the acquisition of TDC Sverige AB for an enterprise value of SEK 2.9 billion.

In connection with the acquisition, Tele2 intends to perform a rights issue of approximately SEK 3 billion.

The acquisition is conditional upon approval by the relevant competition authorities.

Vinge’s team primarily consisted of partners Johan Winnerblad, Eva Fredrikson and Carl Johan af Petersens together with counsel Matthias Pannier and associates Mathilda Persson, Albert Wållgren, Mika Jordan, Sara Strandberg, Christoffer Nordin and Ludvig Wettergren. Partner Charlotte Levin and associate Amanda Knutsson provided capital markets advice. Partner Johan Karlsson and associate Karl Samuelsson provided competition law advice.

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021