Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge advises Smart Eye AB in conjunction with its listing on Nasdaq First North
Mandate

Vinge advises Smart Eye AB in conjunction with its listing on Nasdaq First North

November 11, 2016

Vinge has advised Smart Eye AB in connection with the listing of Smart Eye’s shares on Nasdaq First North.

In connection with the listing, a new issue of not more than 1 750 000 shares was performed whereupon Smart Eye will receive not more than SEK 80 500 000. The offer is directed to the general public and institutional investors. The prospectus was published on 10 November and the first day of trading is 7 December.

Vinge’s team primarily consisted of responsible partner Anders Strid, Magnus Pauli (client relationship), Frida Bäckegren (project manager due diligence and prospectus), Joel Zetterström and Natalie Bäck (IP), Jonas Lindeblad (employment), Björn Nicolai and Karin Wisenius (EU and competition), Victor Ericsson (tax) and company assistant Camilla Andersson.

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

 The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

 The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

 On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021