Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge advises J.P. Morgan, Nordea and SEB Enskilda in connection with SAS rights issue
Mandate

Vinge advises J.P. Morgan, Nordea and SEB Enskilda in connection with SAS rights issue

February 09, 2010

Vinge is advising J.P Morgan, Nordea and SEB Enskilda in connection with SAS AB’s new issue of ordinary shares for approximately SEK 5 billion with pre-emption rights for the company’s existing shareholders. J.P. Morgan, Nordea and SEB Enskilda which are acting as Joint Global Co-ordinators, Joint Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners in the rights issue have, together with DnB NOR Markets, the Royal Bank of Scotland and Danske Markets, confirmed their willingness, subject to certain conditions, to severally enter into underwriting agreements in respect of 42.4 per cent of the shares in the issue.

SAS AB is listed on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm, NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen and Oslo Børs.

Vinge’s team primarily consisted of partners Göran Nyström, Rikard Stenberg and Lennart Larsson together with associates Johan Thiman, Johan Norström and Mårten Svensson.

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

 The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

 The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

 On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021