Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. VINGE ADVISES FIDELIO CAPITAL IN CONNECTION WITH NORDIC CAPITAL’S INVEStMENT IN ANICURA
Mandate

VINGE ADVISES FIDELIO CAPITAL IN CONNECTION WITH NORDIC CAPITAL’S INVEStMENT IN ANICURA

July 01, 2014

Vinge advises Fidelio Capital in connection with Nordic Capital’s investment in AniCura. AniCura is owned by a large number of staff, the Foundation Djursjukhus i Stor-Stockholm and the Swedish investment firm Fidelio Capital. All parties will remain significant co-owners together with Nordic Capital. Through Nordic Capital’s co-ownership, resources will be made available for, among other things, establishing a new veterinary specialist neurological centre at AniCura Albano Animal Hospital in Danderyd, Sweden. Nordic Capital’s investment is subject to approval from the relevant competition authorities.

Partners Jonas Bergström and Johan Winnerblad together with, among others, associates Peter Sundgren, Gustav Jönsson, Amanda Winberg, Johan Mattson, Emelie Klefbeck and project assistant Pernilla Warg advises Fidelio Capital. Partner Marcus Glader advises on competition law.

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

 The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

 The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

 On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021