Vinge Logotype
Svenska English 18D7E0DE-2035-40AE-A740-8F45A358A8F4 Login
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge advises Com Hem in connection with its application for listing on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm
Mandate

Vinge advises Com Hem in connection with its application for listing on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm

June 03, 2014


Following the announcement of its intention to float on May 23, 2014, Com Hem Holding AB (publ) (“Com Hem”), a leading provider of TV, broadband and fixed telephony services in Sweden, has today published a prospectus and announced the price range for the initial public offering of its shares and its listing on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm. Vinge advises Com Hem in connection with the listing.
 
The Company will raise gross proceeds of up to SEK 6.24 billion in the initial public offering.
 
Vinge’s team primarily consists of partners Peter Bäärnhielm and Jesper Schönbeck and associates David Andersson, Joakim Hagberg, Sabina Börjesson, Charlotta Järnstedt and Tora Hansjons.

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021