We use cookies to give you a better Web experience. By visiting our website you agree to our use of cookies. Read about cookies
OK
  1. Home
  2. Mandates
  3. Vinge advises Alder II in conjunction with the acquisition of Scanacon

Mandate Vinge advises Alder II in conjunction with the acquisition of Scanacon

September 26, 2018

Alder II has entered into an agreement together with the management of the company to acquire the entire issued share capital of Scanacon Intressenter from the seller Verdane Capital.

Scanacon will be the first investment in Alder’s new fund, i.e. Alder II. Alder II is a Swedish based investment fund which invests in Nordic sustainable technology companies. The investments focus on established companies in the Nordic region.

Vinge’s team consisted of, among others, Johan Larsson, Albert Wållgren, Filip Brosset, Manne Bergström, Stina Bengtsson, Ludvig Wettergren and Andreas Lexhag which represented the purchaser Alder II in connection with the acquisition.  

Vinge contributes to IUMI Eye

 International Union of Marine Insurers (IUMI) is preparing for its first web based conference – Stockholm 2020 – of which Vinge is a proud sponsor. In the latest edition of IUMI Eye, published just in time for the conference, Vinge’s Paula Bäckdén and Sweden Insurance’s senior advisor Mikaela Tamm discuss the implications of waiving liability limitations.
September 15, 2020

Vinge – Best law firm for female business lawyers

 Vinge has been awarded “Best Nordic Business Law Firm for Women” at the European Women in Business Law Awards which took place in London on 10 September. For the eighth time, Vinge has won the award as the law firm which has been most successful in relation to its gender equality work.
September 10, 2020

Clarification of the interpretation of ”nearest suitable railway station”

 Road transport performed by Samskip Sia in Sweden has been confirmed to be within the framework of a permitted combined transport through a decision of the Administrative court of Falun in Sweden. The central question in the case was how to interpret the term “nearest suitable railway station”
June 30, 2020