Mandate

Vinge advises ALAFCO in connection with leasing of 4 brand new Airbus A320-NEO to SAS, delivered by Airbus from a production facility in Hamburg

February 03, 2021

Vinge has advised ALAFCO Aviation Lease and Finance Company, a Kuwait based, world leading operator in the airplane leasing business, in connection with the lease of 4 Airbus A320-NEOs, the new, more fuel-efficient narrow-body airplane, to Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark-Norway-Sweden (SAS).

Vinge has also managed the registration of all these new airplanes at the Swedish Transport Authority in the Aircraft Register and collaborated with international law firms as regards registration security rights in the International Aircraft Register which is maintained in Dublin according to the Cape Town Convention.

Vinge’s team consisted of partner, Fredrik Wilkens, together with Henrik Schön, Project Manager, as well as Anton Sjökvist and Elias Bohlin.

New statute prohibits unfair terms and conditions and practices in conjunction with the purchase of agricultural and food products

The so-called UTP Act prohibits buyers from using certain terms and conditions and practices against suppliers of agricultural and food products. The Swedish Competition Authority exercises supervision and can, among other things, carry out unannounced inspections and order individual to attend formal interviews. In conjunction with violations, sanctions such as injunctions subject to a default fine or a sanction fee of up to one per cent of the buyer’s annual turnover can be imposed. The UTP Act will enter into force on 1 November 2021 and will also be applicable to contracts which are entered into prior to this date.
October 05, 2021

Vinge employs additional antitrust economists to further strengthen its practice

We welcome Adam Löfquist and Carl Widstrand to our EU, Competition & Regulatory practice group.
September 30, 2021

European Commission provides sanctions compliance guidance

The European Commission has recently issued three opinions regarding the interpretation of asset freeze provisions in certain sanctions legislation pertaining to Central African Republic, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The opinions are also of relevance for other sanctions regimes which provide for the same or similar restrictions. Therefore, their practical relevance goes far beyond the sanctions regimes in the context of which they were issued and they therefore provide for helpful guidance regarding the required thresholds for sanctions compliance generally.
September 20, 2021