Mandate

Vinge advises AB Novestra in connection with its in kind acquisition of Strax Group GmbH and change of name to Strax AB

May 19, 2016

Vinge has advised AB Novestra (publ) (“Novestra”) in connection with its acquisition of Strax Group GmbH. The acquisition was approved by the annual general meeting of shareholders in Novestra on April 26, 2016 and the general meeting also resolved to change the name of the company to Strax AB. The acquisition of the shares in Strax Group GmbH was made by an issue in kind where the purchase price consisted of 80 571 293 newly issued shares in Novestra. The newly issued shares were admitted to trading on Nasdaq Stockholm, Small Cap, on May 12, 2016 under the new ticker STRAX.

Strax is a global specialist within mobile accessories with own brands, such as Xqisit, Gear4, Urbanista, Agna and Avo. The own brands are complemented with OEM brands, aftermarket brands, licensed brands and an end-to-end service offering. In total, Strax has in excess of 600 B2B customers worldwide, including customers such as Dixons Carphone, Staples, Swisscom, Telenor, T-Mobile and Amazon. Strax operates through subsidiaries in Germany, France, UK, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, the US, Hong Kong and China.

Vinge’s team primarily consisted of Jesper Schönbeck, Rikard Lindahl, Matthias Pannier and Malte Hedlund.

 

The Swedish rules on cabotage transport and posting will change on 2 and 21 February 2022

The Swedish government has decided on a number of new rules concerning cabotage transports, combined transports, transport customer responsibility for driving and rest times and posting of workers.
January 21, 2022

Vinge presents the Swedish chapter for the 2022 version of The Legal 500: Private Equity Country Comparative Guide

The guide provides an overview of the Swedish Private Equity market and the salient legislation in connection with PE transactions in Sweden.
January 11, 2022

The prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings

On Tuesday 21 December, the EU Court of Justice delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Bank Melli Iran case (Case C-124/20) on the interpretation of the EU Blocking Statute regarding compliance with third country sanctions. According to the Court, the prohibition imposed by EU law on complying with secondary sanctions laid down by the United States against Iran may be relied on in civil proceedings. Following the Court’s judgment, anyone seeking to terminate a contract with a person or business subject to US sanctions must thoroughly consider if the termination is motivated by other reasons than the existing sanctions and reflect on whether to apply to the Commission for a derogation from the Blocking Statute.
December 23, 2021