Mandate

Acquisition of Alvedon approved

April 07, 2009

The Swedish Competition Authority has, following an in-depth investigation, on 3 April 2009 cleared GlaxoSmithKline’s acquisition of a portfolio of drugs, including i.a. the brand Alvedon, from AstraZeneca.

Alvedon is the leading painkiller brand in Sweden. GlaxoSmithKline controlled already prior to the acquisition Panodil, one of the main competing brands. The transaction was notified by the parties on 22 December 2008.
The Competition Authority carried out an extensive market investigation and retained external expertise to simulate the effects of the combination.

“Although the transaction involved a strong market position in painkillers based on paracetamol, the Competition Authority could eventually conclude that the transaction did not significantly impede the existence or development of effective competition. The Competition Authority’s decision is, of course, satisfactory for the parties but also of principle importance”, says Johan Karlsson, responsible partner for Vinge’s competition team, who acted for AstraZeneca.

“It is one of the few cases where efficiencies made a real difference for the outcome. The decision also shows that the Competition Authority, which it should do, could also take into account future changes in the market place, in this case the liberalization of the pharmaceutical market.”

Vinge advised AstraZeneca. Vinge’s competition team included Johan Karlsson (responsible partner), Mattias Ganslandt (economist), Per Karlsson (counsel), Peter Alstergren (associate) and Carl Johan Sundqvist (associate).   

Guidance judgment on the criminal liability for ordering a cabotage transport

The ordering of a road transport made by one of the largest freight forwarders in Sweden has been considered in accordance with the conditions for legal cabotage transports through a decision from the Court of Appeal over Skåne and Blekinge. The Court of Appeal, thus, changes the District Court’s judgment and acquits the freight forwarder. The central issue in the case was how the number of cabotage transports should be calculated.
May 07, 2021

The Scope of Work According to AB 04

One of the most important parts of a construction agreement is the part where the scope of work is defined. There is a major difference between finding scope of work issues early in a construction project, instead of later during the execution phase.
May 04, 2021

A shift in EU merger control policy and practice could affect deal certainty and create opportunities for complainants

The European Commission is expanding its control of mergers and acquisitions within the existing legal framework, allowing national authorities to refer a transaction they do not have jurisdiction over for review in Brussels.
April 26, 2021