Mandate Acquisition of Alvedon approved

April 07, 2009

The Swedish Competition Authority has, following an in-depth investigation, on 3 April 2009 cleared GlaxoSmithKline’s acquisition of a portfolio of drugs, including i.a. the brand Alvedon, from AstraZeneca.

Alvedon is the leading painkiller brand in Sweden. GlaxoSmithKline controlled already prior to the acquisition Panodil, one of the main competing brands. The transaction was notified by the parties on 22 December 2008.
The Competition Authority carried out an extensive market investigation and retained external expertise to simulate the effects of the combination.

“Although the transaction involved a strong market position in painkillers based on paracetamol, the Competition Authority could eventually conclude that the transaction did not significantly impede the existence or development of effective competition. The Competition Authority’s decision is, of course, satisfactory for the parties but also of principle importance”, says Johan Karlsson, responsible partner for Vinge’s competition team, who acted for AstraZeneca.

“It is one of the few cases where efficiencies made a real difference for the outcome. The decision also shows that the Competition Authority, which it should do, could also take into account future changes in the market place, in this case the liberalization of the pharmaceutical market.”

Vinge advised AstraZeneca. Vinge’s competition team included Johan Karlsson (responsible partner), Mattias Ganslandt (economist), Per Karlsson (counsel), Peter Alstergren (associate) and Carl Johan Sundqvist (associate).   

Clarification of the interpretation of ”nearest suitable railway station”

Road transport performed by Samskip Sia in Sweden has been confirmed to be within the framework of a permitted combined transport through a decision of the Administrative court of Falun in Sweden. The central question in the case was how to interpret the term “nearest suitable railway station”
June 30, 2020

DAC 6 – EU Directive concerning reportable cross‑border tax arrangements

DAC 6 is a EU Directive which entails that advisers are subject to a duty to notify the relevant tax authorities concerning their client’s cross‑border arrangements. The purpose of the information disclosure obligation is to combat tax evasion, tax fraud and tax avoidance.
June 04, 2020

The importance of continuous focus on compliance procedures in disrupting times

A large number of corporations will most certainly be severely impacted by the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. The new challenges will impact companies’ compliance risks, which are likely to be different and, to a certain extent, increased. It is crucial that - also in disrupting times - internal compliance procedures are maintained and that new risks are identified and mitigated.
May 28, 2020